Behind 121 FLA The RED PILL, Killer Australian Family Courts, Graft, Killer judges, Child Trafficking, Exploitation and Abuse Industry, Murder Incorporated

Featured

 

922710_10151749833533804_1657312976_n

$21,000,000,000 AUD PA 100,000 LAWYERS, BARBARISUM NO RULE OF LAW it is literally the Manson family on $21,000,000,000 Billion Dollar organised crime spree by way of fraud on steroids, lie cheat slander seal, in full knowledge, consent and facilitated by the judiciary, 2 to 4 deaths per day.

If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. George Washington (22 February173214 December1799)

“Deprivation of the Child is Odious” Contact PM Tony Abbott for Children Everywhere.

PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION HERE

untitled

In secret courts with NO juries, Our Children, our families, our culture, our future under attack from within, organised crime graft profiting from crime and judicial corruption ambush psychological war against Australian Children and Families, with destructive and lethal consequences’.

Antisocial Narcisstic socialist feminist treachery, bigotry and treasons under the Australian constitution we can not receive fair justice from this judiciary, FCA has been overrun by this foreign political violent power sociopathic pac, EMILY’s List is a political action committee (Super PAC) “More women in parliament, on corporate boards and in our courts“.

Feminist antisocial sociopathic pac or any other PAC’s have no place in the ‘Australian Commonwealth’ courts, by way of constitutional separation of power, it is treason, complete disregard for children and law, unlawful oppression and tyranny.

Feminist antisocial sociopathic pack, are as is Syria’s antisocial sociopathic pac, North Korea’s, Soviet Russia’s, China’s, Nazi antisocial sociopathic pac.

They exploit and abuse children and families with impunity, in their ambitions of power to create a socialist feminist republic, money through children via the courts. “Early Money Is Like Yeast” (i.e., it raises dough), feminism is a MSS KGB fuelled construct.

Women Against Feminism

Let us therefore animate and encourage each other, and show the whole world that a Freeman, contending for liberty on his own ground, is superior to any slavish mercenary on earth. George Washington (22 February 173214 December 1799)

LNP, Mr. TONY ABBOTT, KNOW THE ENEMY … ANTISOCIAL PARACITIC AMBUSH APD … FEMINIST PIGS ARE MORE EQUAL IN AUSTRALIA, HIDEN WAR ON AUSTRALIAN CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, THERE IS NO ETHIC’S OR MORALS OR HONOUR OR RULE OF LAW OR VALUES OR AUSTRALIAN STANDARDS IN THIS DYSFUNCTIONAL CHILD TRAFFICKING MONEY HUNGRY INDUSTRY, GRAFT, TREACHERY AND SEDITION INSIGHTING DEEP HATRED OF THE JUDICURY, BUREAUCRACY AND GOVERNMENT ELECT … WE MUST CHANGE THIS FOR OUR CHILDREN AND NATIONAL BEST INTEREST.

Albert Einstein once said “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”.

Family courts are designed to ambush people, not deliver justice.

Socialists are the most antisocial dangerous deadly animals on the planet.

ONLY PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY WORKS, DEMOCRACY AND JURIES.

NO JUSTICE NO PEACE

The General hopes and trusts that every officer and man will endeavor to live and act as becomes a Christian soldier defending the dearest rights and liberties of his country. George Washington (22 February 173214 December 1799)

Kids do best in the care of their family, feminism money and power, egocentric sociopathic doctrine, profits from slandering their victims, rights for women but not men and boys.

Sociopaths notably neglect kids, is why they promote child care, instead of family care. is not a gender thing, humane means ethically and morally, some are genetically inhuman, evil gene, incapable of true humane behaviour, looks human, sounds human, not human.

It is inhuman, sociopathic doctrine, sociopaths, psychopaths are not human, incapable of true ethic’s and moral, is a different species, know as speciation.

 

The Positive Impact of Fathers Involvement is ignored for profits, with devastating consequences for our children and there lives.

 

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Albert Einstein

Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins133991.html#3SP3CY9UCA2XJ3rv.99

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Albert Einstein

Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins133991.html#rSDPuG2qt1TlhdeK.99

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

Albert Einstein

Read more at http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/a/alberteins133991.html#rSDPuG2qt1TlhdeK.99

Political violent politically bigoted Satins Star Chamber Courts, like Saddam Hussein, Bashar al Assad, ALP do not give a crap about you or your kids.

LNP, Mr. Tony Abbott we need to protect our children and families from family court predators.

Stop sociopathic socialist state corruption in FLC and their iron curtain.

Stop graft, exploitation and abuse in the child trafficking industry.

1. Repeal rescind revoke and annul 121. Family Law Act (FLA) their iron curtain secret gag law stopping communication with the Australian public, covering corruption exploitation and abuse.

2. Open the court objective truth, juries on appeals, not subjective bigoted parasitic judiciaries.

3.  Abolish legal aid. Stop funding corrupt illicit sex discrimination. Legal Aid should be nothing more than a self help webpage, not slush funds for politically violent corrupt law firms.

Judges on annual contract and review, based on quality of character or honour, cut their funding and pay.

Family courts are an abomination of treachery sedition and corruption, absolute power corrupts absolutely; John Dalberg-Acton, not in the least children’s interest to subject them to these sociopathic animals.

Humans can, inhuman’s can not self govern, Human the quality of being humane; kindness; benevolence. inhuman lacking human qualities of compassion and mercy; cruel and barbaric, not human in nature or character.

We are facing malignant evil, just doesn’t play by the rules, no ethics or morals.

Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law.

Lawful Rebellion – Clause 61 Magna Carta (1215) That all our law comes…

…And we shall procure nothing from any one, either personally or indirectly, whereby any part of these concessions and liberties might be revoked or diminished; and if any such thing has been procured, let it be void and null, and we shall never make use of it ourselves or through someone else.

Australian holocaust there are some 2 to 4 deaths per day directly Family court Australia related, that goes unnoticed, we really need a commission overseeing FCA, begs the question why LNP are funding feminist industries Australia?

We cant build families on Marxist socialist feminism or build a nation, as socialism fascism communism, why are we allowing feminism to overrun or courts, public services and universities.

George Christensen MP  in Parliament has already described and explained feminism is a’ Trojan Horse’ .

“Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world.”
―     Nelson Mandela

You are naïve if you go to the Australian Family Court in good faith, believing you will get “high-quality and timely judgments” from the FCA judiciary, they are openly dysfunctional, antisocial, lie, slander and cheat, threaten and abuse, narcissism.

There really is no rule of law in family court, judges just dictate and lie, open cesspits of cronyism and corruption, there needs to be open jury trials only in family courts, now only criminals get juries, where children need them.

There would be so much less cost and waist if public employee’s were held accountable to we the people. Corruption is just ignored. Not good business not civil society.

Bmpps4zCYAEs630

The three dogs of family law courts are feminism, socialism and capitalism.

Feminism is egocentric antisocial sociopathic controling and manipulation, its crowning achievement is ABORTION killing babies, an ideal is the sum of its maxims, the axiom of feminism it is an abortion, if a feminist believes in abortion by this premise accept their maxima of self abortion.

There is noting more violent than abortion, is that in the child’s best interest?

The swindle with abortion is the at certain intervals, the ovaries release an ovum, which passes through the fallopian tube into the uterus.

The fertilization of the ovum with the sperm occurs at the ampullary-isthimic junction only.

Once the ovum is released it is not part of the women’s body, and when fertilised with sperm it is a separate human life, that they chose to kill, “pro-choice” to kill.

We are up against a well funded well organised massive group of animals focused on power and money, the very same as facist and socialist ‘PAC’s/.

Most DV and abuse against children is by women, given that DV between men and women is nearly 50/50, = most DV is by women.

This  finding has  been confirmed  across nations and cultures by  pre-eminent violence researcher Murray Straus, whose 2007 paper concluded that dominance by the female.

Stop violence against children

This proves feminism is a false premise, but a multibillion $ industry.

I’m sure the MSS and the KGB are having a good laugh at ASIO CIA MI5 and have a lot to do with the feminist movement, they have the same tactic’s, the leading feminist here is Julia Gillard, owner of Emilie’s list, and has Russian ties, our national security agencies are a joke, they should be telling the world about what human rights abuses going on in the eastern block.

Today there are 30 million men women and children in forced socialist  labor camps, what do you think feminists will do?

Reality is we need to protect our children from all that will do harm, is our only reason for existence, when it comes to that I for one am pro-choice, what ever force or action that takes, we can not count on any government as has been proven time and time again.

The are 30million or more men women and children locked up in socialist Labor camps today. Free the people with free democracy.

Judicial government corruption dishonesty disinformation tyranny, it is a psychological war on families, this is where Australia is going fascist / socialist / feminism, I don’t think we will be able to stop it.

All law and democracy is designed to address dysfunctional ‘Anti-Social’ behaviours and events, to allow social civilised society to flourish to its full potential, the hieratical judicial system is easily corrupted and in its self a dysfunctional failure.

The Australian Child Trafficking Industry is the same, as is in NZ, USA, Canada, Europe, world over.

We are a common people with a common cause a common enemy.

“The Strength of the Constitution Lies in the Will of the People to Defend It.” ~Thomas Edison.

They are using children as bait, ransoming children, when strangers start lying, It takes no leap of imagination to realise you are dealing with corruption, and sociopathy.

Family courts world wide have degenerated into sociopathic antisocial cults and collectives, commonly know as gang stalkers, driven by money and political violence.

Judges like all public servants need to be on annual contract, under constant review.

The real issue we are facing is the dominating prevalence of sociopathic antisocial individuals within society, up to ~1 in 100, in Australia with its current population is some 230,000 psychopath’s, their extremely controlling manipulative and destructive behaviour, the very reason we have judicial and governments systems, that in them selves attract controlling sociopaths like flies … http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp/dsm-5/

Bobby Dickerson “Agreed but internally the system is corrupted thru and thru.  Unless everybody gets on the same page, gets past the shock and awe of what has happened, the loss, the grief we will never move forward to finding solutions.  The effort has to be WorldWide with everybody locked and loaded !”

“The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world that he didn’t exist.”

We were ambushed by Family Court of Australia Brisbane judiciary gross misconduct, acting illegally deliberately knowingly breaching Australian Commonwealth law , Malfeasance, dysfunctional antisocial and Narcissistic, the Australian Constitution proved misbehaviour or incapacity., this judiciary is dangerous and should not be approached.

121 FLA secret courts only serves the politically violent Child Traffickers.

HELP AUSTRALIAN CHILDREN SIGN THIS PETITION HERE

Tony Abbott, PM Australia: Open jury trials in Australian Family Courts

Legal Aid Queensland acting illegally Malfeasance.

ICL acting illegally Nonfeasance Misfeasance.

This is a dysfunctional criminally corrupt secret industry kept a corrupt secret with 121 FLA, LAQ ICL Child Lawyer and consultant’s purger to obstruct pervert and defeat justice.

CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 35 Giving false testimony

CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 36 Fabricating evidence

What should be straight forward 50/50 has been dragged through Family Court Australia from August 2010 at huge expense, by Legal Aid Queensland family law team of narcisstic antisocial politically violent duplicitic pseudo feminists, with purgery and deceit.

The kicker is the more conflict the more profit corrupt ICL child lawyers and the industry makes, the industry makes every effort to lie, purger and cheat to fuel conflict.

What is happening is a cycle of evil, antisocial behaviour being administered, starting from sociopathic parenting.

” non accidental verbal or symbolic acts by a child’s parent or caregiver that result, or have reasonable potential to result, in significant psychological harm to the child.” DSM5

“What’s done to children, they will do to society” – Karl Menninger, MD. (1893-1990) American psychiatrist.

Official Crimes against Australian Children, child trafficking.

Child Trafficking in Australia

Family Court Australia Murder incorporated, kiddie for cash law firms, we have your kiddies, what are you going to do about it?

Fascism, Feminism, Socialism, Racism,  etc are absolute Dysfunctional Sociopathic and Sadistic, why are you pushing sociopathy on Australians?

They are sociopathic gender war mongers creating conflict, are sociopathic collectives, which is a degenerate parasitic subspecies, the lowest form of humanity, that invoke all conflict and wars.

We need you to step up, stand up for each other, fight the good fight, your kids need to know you never gave up on them.

50/50 shared care is the civilised standard.

Contact with Non-Custodial Fathers and Children’s Wellbeing

Although it is usually assumed that mothers are children’s primary care givers, fathers also play an important role in children’s development. Besides providing economic resources, fathers are also sources of emotional support, practical assistance, information, guidance, and supervision.
A large body of research shows that the support and involvement of both parents is associated with a number of positive child outcomes, including academic achievement, good behaviour, psychological adjustment, a positive self- concept, and social competence.

Furthermore, when both parents exercise control and supervision appropriate to children’s developmental level, children experience a similar range of benefits (Rollins and Thomas 1979; Maccoby and Martin 1983).

Read More http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp/contact-with-non-custodial-fathers-and-childrens-wellbeing/

My young son is missing since November 2012 because I complained to CAFS Queensland children’s detention centre Eagleby about unexplained burses.

I have found the Australian family courts deliberately and intentionally extremely treacherous and corrupt trafficking in children, extinguishing hard won democratic rights and freedoms, fair and just hearings, they are exploiting and abusing my young son as well as many Australian children.

The corruption of the Australian family courts is so complete and being not only ignored by all levels of government, both the socialist left ALP and the Fascist right LNP are both sociopathic, Narcisstic, exploiting as is sociopathic feminism.

Vote for anyone that doesn’t give preferences to ALP (socialist) or LNP (fascist)

The democratic system we have is out of date, where the swindle is, we surrender our democratic vote to fearless leader A B C or D and funky party A B C or D gives us justice, maybe, not likely, not ever.

It is tyrannical because the parties are based on hierarchy, hierarchies
form pyramid structures; there weakness is the points, all the power is focused
at the top, an unjust structure, where you are ignored.

The only real solution is true and pure democracy, pure democracy forms
spheres, mathematically superior, hyper mathematics, and universal law.

Do you form hierarchies with your friends or spheres?

Direct democracy via technology is the only way we will get true justice …

Vote [1] for Senator Online

Tyranny is narcissism (DSM-5), and that is the problem we are having globally
with all governments, Tyranny / narcissism built on hierarchal pyramid
structures.

True democracy forms a sphere where all members have an equal voice and vote,
the leaders are at the centre but have no more power than the newest member,
only true democracy can be just and deliver justice for all.

Do we trust ALP, do we trust the LNP, and can we trust any party?

NO, ever wonder why there are so many protests and wars?

Purely because of lacking democracy.

How about this, you give us our democracy, our democracy will give us our justice.

There is no real justice without true democracy, the only true democracy is direct democracy.

Party politics and policy is not proper true democracy.
The Australian Democrats http://www.democrats.org.au
The party is based on the principles of honesty, tolerance, compassion and direct democracy through postal ballots of all members, so that “there should be no hierarchical structure …

by which a carefully engineered elite could make decisions for the members.”[8]:p187 From the outset, members’ participation was fiercely protected in national and
divisional constitutions prescribing internal elections, regular meeting protocols, annual conferences—and monthly journals for open discussion and balloting. Dispute resolution procedures were established, with final recourse to a party ombudsman and membership ballot.

This is democracy at work, is the future. http://www.abc.net.au/votecompass/

Fathers have nowhere to turn to, and no knowledge or defence against this treacherous Narcisstic abuse.

Dear ***** [FUA] , I hope that you don’t mind my writing for some advice. on the 29th  – 07 – 2012 we lost our eldest Son  to suicide … he was trying desperately to gain some access for us to see his 3 youngest Children. We’ve not seen them now for  almost 3 years  . is there somewhere my Husband and I can go to … we are pensioners, we  baby sat those  Children  each day of their lives, until their Mother took them away …… I’ve now lost all hope of anything  being able to help us…. Kindest Regards ***** *****

Please investigate the mass deaths linked to the Australian family courts, some 2 or more deaths per day in Australia alone.

Being in the courts now know to well how nasty and corrupt these people in the industry are. I personally know people who have suicided.

“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.” George Washington (22 February 173214 December 1799 

I ask the LNP to sack the current Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie for grand standing at the cost of Australian and Queensland children and families, Malfeasance  and complicity the current Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie is ignoring Juveniles in QLD prisons: 20 years of shame, the corruption in legal aid Queensland, and mass murder.

In war, truth is the first casualty. Death is better, a milder fate than tyranny. Aeschylus

Lest We Forget

013

The ANZAC’s fought and died for our children’s rights to grow free from treachery and tyranny, we owe the ANZAC’s everything,.

The ANZAC legacy and democratic rights has been extinguished in one generation by judiciary corruption and greed.

Children are not safe in Australia.

Malfeasance and complicity the current Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie is ignoring the corruption in legal aid Queensland, mass murder, Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie given LNP the reputation as the nasty party, there is no rule of law or civil rights in the Australian family court or Queensland.

Under Anthony Reilly Chief executive officer Legal Aids Queensland are extremely   corrupt, spending millions of Queensland dollars on employing politicly violent feminist in their family law team abusing children and families producing false family reports, perjury, tampering with evidence, lie and cheat children.

Quote from a un named ADF soldier “…It was as filthy a Family Law Court fight as had ever existed. I made a promise to my son that before this has finished these people will never do this to another child in this Country ever again. I keep my promises. I don’t care if they are murdered by some-one for their behaviour – its not my problem. All because I was an ex Commando. Problem is, I found out the truth, something they didn’t expect. What this Court is all about is exactly the same as the current proposed Laws to stifle and control the media.”

ANZAC

It is at the point where the Australian public needs and have a duty to take up arms to protect their children and democracy.

Where there is a void of ethic’s or morals it is inhuman, only animal, humanity needs to act, when an animal kills it needs to be destroyed.

What is presented as feminism is in fact a Dysfunctional Antisocial Narcisstic Collective. Criminally motivated exploitation of our children, driven by greed for power and money, the same ilk as ‘Emily’s List’ of bigoted feminist, feminism is socialism / communism in a dress.

The family court judiciary is corrupt with no accountability, they know exactly how to break and defeat the law and justice and they enjoy doing it, destroying lives and killing deliberately and knowingly.

They actively avoid truth, building on understanding and, mediation, adopting political violence.

As Darwin predicts they are a variant species collective with no ethics or morals, as many regimes throughout history as is Bashar al-Assad now proving.

Dysfunctional anti-social Narcisstic individuals need to be detected early and rejected before they can collect in numbers and destroy innocent lives.

Humanity is still young naïve, still have not learnt enough from behavioural tragedy children suffering.

Peaceful resolution is not profitable.

Dysfunctional Narcissism seems the modern term for evil it is very where especially ever in bureaucracy, judiciary and government, it is the real enemy of civilized society, peace and harmony.

It is well hidden in the back ground behind many facades socialism, fascism, feminism and so on… And needs to be openly recognised and discussed.

Psychology as the study of human behaviour that needs to be taught early in school, straight from the DSM-5 along with the constitution and law.

Ultimately psychology has so much to offer civilized society.

Julia Gillard’s narcissism was her downfall, we just seen the narcissism at the head of ALP.

Feminists like socialist and fascism is just another façade for age old enemy, Narcissism. Narcissism is and has always been the real enemy

945024_539316726120630_321357974_n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stop Narcissistic lawyers trafficking our children, Stop Narcissism in governments, Vote against Narcissism, stop Narcissism in our courts, stop Narcissists waging war .

The hidden war a civil war on our children and families, It is a 16 billion dollar industry run by lawyer for lawyers, child trafficking industry.

The most notable thing about the courts Judiciary themselves is the criminality, treachery and corruption.

Have degenerated into Antisocial Narcisstic Collective, criminally motivated antisocial narcissism defeating justice, excluding honest practitioners, corruption, bias, treachery, lies, purger, deceit, with no accountability, not judicial in the least.

Child exploitation is the new 16 billion dollar per year boom industry, with no regard for the kids, the families or the law..

The most notable aspect of socialist regimes is how antisocial and despotic they are, duplicity.

The Australian family court antisocial judiciaries are killing 2 or more good people every day here in Australia alone.

It is an antisocial psyc war on children and families aimed at defeating justice for power and profit, thousands of Australian families are victimised, trapped every year.

50/50 shared care is the civilised standard.

If for no good reason one parent works against 50/50 it could be said they are being dysfunctional, antisocial and should be assessed for antisocial personality disorder.

What we are seeing is justice being defeated by collectives of dysfunctional antisocial narcisstic judiciaries and bureaucracies simply because there is no accountability. By this function good practitioners are ejected.

Ever wonder how these narcisstic antisocial and psychotic people get jobs and position in judiciaries and bureaucries, ever wonder why the world is in perpetual war?

Owen’s theorem Owen’s syndrome Robert Owen (14 May 1771 – 17 November) was a Welsh social reformer and one of the founders of socialism and the cooperative movement. Owen’s son Robert Dale stayed at New Harmony after its collapse. He had a different assessment of his father’s experiment.

“All cooperative schemes which provide equal remuneration to the skilled and industrious and the ignorant and idle must work their own downfall, for by this unjust plan … they must of necessity eliminate the valuable members … and retain only the improvident, unskilled, and vicious.”

fascism feminism terrorism socialism racism communism (see a pattern?) are all dysfunctional antisocial sociopathic projections … DSM5 http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp/dsm-5/

It is not hard to see how these antisocial, narcisstic judiciaries and bureaucries collectives form.

Democracy is a form of government in which all eligible citizens have an equal say in the decisions that affect their lives.

Publicity is justly commended as a remedy for social and industrial diseases. Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman.

Louis Dembitz Brandeis (1856-11-13 – 1941-10-03) was an important American litigator, Supreme Court Justice, advocate of privacy, and developer of the Brandeis Brief

121 FLA secret courts only serves the Child Traffickers.

The courts will never work, never deliver justice, we have to take it on our selves to deliver justice.

NAME AND SHAME HERE

The only real solution is public accountabilityxxhttp://austrpa.org/wp/

 

 

 

 

Name and Shame wall 

contact-deniers-banner

Canadian Registry for Public Accountability (CRPA)

pict002

 

 

 

 

 

APD  … KNOW THE ENEMY …

DSM-5 Criteria for the Personality Disorders

General Criteria for a Personality Disorder

The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits. To diagnose a personality disorder, the following criteria must be met

A.Significant impairments in self (identity or self-direction) and interpersonal (empathy or intimacy) functioning.

B.One or more pathological personality trait domains or trait facets.

C.The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are relatively stable across time and consistent across situations.

D.The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are not better understood as normative for the individual’s developmental stage or socio-cultural environment.

E.The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are not solely due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., severe head trauma).

Antisocial Personality Disorder

DSM-5 Criteria – Revised April 2012

The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits. To diagnose antisocial personality disorder, the following criteria must be met:

A.Significant impairments in personality functioning manifest by:

1.Impairments in self functioning (a or b):

A.Identity: Ego-centrism; self-esteem derived from personal gain, power, or pleasure.

B.Self-direction: Goal-setting based on personal gratification; absence of prosocial internal standards associated with failure to conform to lawful or culturally normative ethical behaviour.

AND

2.Impairments in interpersonal functioning (a or b):

a.Empathy: Lack of concern for feelings, needs, or suffering of others; lack of remorse after hurting or mistreating another.

b.Intimacy: Incapacity for mutually intimate relationships, as exploitation is a primary means of relating to others, including by deceit and coercion; use of dominance or intimidation to control others.

B. Pathological personality traits in the following domains:

1. Antagonism, characterized by:

A. Manipulativeness: Frequent use of subterfuge to influence or control others; use of seduction, charm, glibness, or ingratiation to achieve one„s ends.

B. Deceitfulness: Dishonesty and fraudulence; misrepresentation of self; embellishment or fabrication when relating events.

C. Callousness: Lack of concern for feelings or problems of others; lack of guilt or remorse about the negative or harmful effects of one„s actions on others; aggression; sadism.

D. Hostility: Persistent or frequent angry feelings; anger or irritability in response to minor slights and insults; mean, nasty, or vengeful behaviour.

2. Disinhibition, characterized by:

A. Irresponsibility: Disregard for – and failure to honour – financial and other obligations or commitments; lack of respect for – and lack of follow through on – agreements and promises.

B. Impulsivity: Acting on the spur of the moment in response to immediate stimuli; acting on a momentary basis without a plan or consideration of outcomes; difficulty establishing and following plans.

C. Risk taking: Engagement in dangerous, risky, and potentially self-damaging activities, unnecessarily and without regard for consequences; boredom proneness and thoughtless initiation of activities to counter boredom; lack of concern for one„s limitations and denial of the reality of personal danger.

C. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are relatively stable across time and consistent across situations.

D. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s personality trait expression are not better understood as normative for the individual’s developmental stage or socio-cultural environment.

E. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual’s. personality trait expression are not solely due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., severe head trauma).

F. The individual is at least age 18 years.

Narcissistic Personality Disorder

DSM-5 Criteria – Revised June 2011

The essential features of a personality disorder are impairments in

personality (self and interpersonal) functioning and the presence of pathological personality traits. To diagnose narcissistic personality disorder, the following criteria must be met:

A. Significant impairments in personality functioning manifest by:

1.Impairments in self functioning (a or b):

a. Identity: Excessive reference to others for self-definition and self-esteem regulation; exaggerated self-appraisal may be inflated or deflated, or vacillate between extremes; emotional regulation mirrors fluctuations in self-esteem.

b. Self-direction: Goal-setting is based on gaining approval from others; personal standards are unreasonably high in order to see oneself as exceptional, or too low based on a sense of entitlement; often unaware of own motivations.

AND

2. Impairments in interpersonal functioning (a or b):

a. Empathy: Impaired ability to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others; excessively attuned to reactions of others, but only if perceived as relevant to self; over- or underestimate of own effect on others.

b. Intimacy: Relationships largely superficial and exist to serve self-esteem regulation; mutuality constrained by little genuine interest in others‟ experiences and predominance of a need for personal gain

B. Pathological personality traits in the following domain:

1. Antagonism, characterized by:

a. Grandiosity: Feelings of entitlement, either overt or covert; self-centeredness; firmly holding to the belief that one is better than others; condescending toward others.

b. Attention seeking: Excessive attempts to attract and be the focus of the attention of others; admiration seeking.

C. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s personality trait expression are relatively stable across time and consistent across situations.

D. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s personality trait expression are not better understood as normative for the individual‟s developmental stage or socio-cultural environment.

E. The impairments in personality functioning and the individual‟s personality trait expression are not solely due to the direct physiological effects of a substance (e.g., a drug of abuse, medication) or a general medical condition (e.g., severe head trauma).

 

 

PRIVACY NOTICE DISCLAIMER

THIS IS A POLITICAL COMMUNICATION PAGE / SITE AS INFERED AND ACTUAL FREEDOM OF SPEACH INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION. Warning–any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the Australia and United States Federal / State / local Government also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have permission to utilize any information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to photos, and/ or the comments made here. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against any person with regard to this site material and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of personal privacy punishable by law.

we are a Union we raise issue with the government and departments

We can’t give you any advice, were not lawyers, I do suggest you learn to use stealth, ‘high quality’ audio and video (12meg) record every meeting and ‘especially any court reporters psyc etc’, and suggest you get talking to these people regards your case asap … Family Law Web Guide

CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 28

Interfering with political liberty

Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise or performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence.

Penalty:  Imprisonment for 3 years.

“By the end of today, another 200 children will have been cruelly separated from their fathers in secret family courts.”

          Fatherlessness is an obscenity. No child should be denied their human right to a father yet nearly 1 in 3 children now lives without a father in the UK – that’s nearly 4 million fatherless children.   Help us end the cruel & degrading treatment of families by the government.

Why is there only a parliamentary office for women, and not

children and men?

SPEAK UP LET US HEAR YOU, JOIN US,

WE ARE INVITING ALL FAMILY AND FRIENDS TO JOIN WITH US IN BUILDING A NATION NETWORK SUPORTING GOOD FATHERS.

REGISTER and BECOME A MEMBER OF FATHERS UNION of AUSTRALIA

You are not alone; please don’t hesitate to ask for support www.fathersunionaustralia.com

Register here now, sign our petition, send this link on to everyone you know, mates, family, friends …

It is well know and documented Australian Federal Magistrates and Family courts, state and federal departments are over run with bigotry, corruption, completely unabated discrimination and abuse directed against Fathers, negatively impacting on children.

kids need Dad’s.

The bureaucratic abuse of Dad’s is costing not only billions in public funds more over it is destroying the lives of children and Fathers.

Stand up for all Australian Kids, these new laws will only harm kids, help bring back justice and equality to Australia.

Australian Kids need your support more than ever.

Send this to your member of parliament and every other member you can now before it’s too late…

Dad’s and kid’s alike are victims of abuse and policies.

Globally, society is suffering under the weight of abuse of public office.

We are demanding a ROYAL COMMISSION into CORRUPTION in and around the AUSTRALIAN FEDERAL and FAMILY  COURTS

When you sign the petition (Check your Email and junk mail box for he confirmation code so you post appears here)

Then click ‘register’ on the LEFT side of this page as well and Please Forward to family and friends…

WARREN GIBSON,

Justin Gonsalez,

Steve Wickenden, 4218 CHILD ABUSE THERE IS NO EXCUSE.

chris, 4215 i will do what eva it takes to rid this as my kids are the victims and fatherless..my childsupport i pay goes towards paying her lawyers as even my family are getting threatning letters.the schools they go wont give me imformation on there development..my story goes on as ive been fighting past 7years with no joy..i have commited no crime or violence yet have been painted like that..all along have been told to walk away..yet i ask why should i??i am there father..aleination of children is child abuse yet doesnt get mentioned..why???if i did to the kids what there mother is i wouldnt be here..ide be locked up..i will do what eva it takes to help make changes and give what our kids diserve..and thats support and love that only a father can give..

plupesype,

Alex,

xxxxxxxx, 2283

Shane Hampson, 4209 THERES NO EXCUSE FOR THIS INEQUALITY

Craig Havenaar, 2169 I am in a blended Family , a Dad and step Dad to 9 kids, 2 of them who are teenagers are being forced by the courts to not be with me, initial reasons were because of false allegations I was not fit enough to care for them, what about the other 7 ????????????? if that isnt hypocrisy I dont know what is, and I will bring this up in the media to highlight the situation, it’s no threat, its called democracy !!!

xxxxxxxx, 5000 the destruction of fatherhood is the destruction of the nation .. and this is increasingly obvious to some .. with eyes to see …and hearts to love …

ingrid jusice, 5114 my family and my son have gone through hell in the federal court,8 years of listening to bullshit and lining lawyers pockets,also the judges seem to be sooooo biased towards mothers,yes thats right its an unfair system

Danny Bennett-Hillier, 2154 Great to know that others are pushing for change!

Lisa Macumber, 3136 Its about time the government stood up and did something to protect our men before more of them end up suiciding and our children are left alone, confused and fatherless

John D Mahoney, 2010

John Findlay, 4115 Why am I perceived to be a lesser parent because of my genitals ? Why do I have to fight in court and spend vast amounts of money for the right to spend time with my children ? Why do I have a DVO against me for a TXT message when I was trying to protect my children from a cult ? Why dont I have any say in my childrens lives ? Why isnt this important to everyone when almost 50% of families are failing ? Why are women so nastie and willing to use their own children as a tool of revenge. Why does everyone know that women are abusing the system except the judges that hand down decishions. The whole system has been corrupted by the lure of money into the pockets of moraly bankrupt lawyers and blinkered judges. We all only want fair ! nothing more, nothing less !

Michael Sheehan, 4478

Michelle Wood, 5290 3 years in court for my brother and my family and him have to spend thousands to listen to some of the most ridiculous crap ever to come out of an adults mouth, meanwhile his ex is fully funded by Legal Aid and enjoying every moment!!

martin caporn, 5019 When it is done, less men and fathers will be lost or distressed. They will be productive again.

Max, 4217 My ongoing experience, it is a beat-up from the get go and very much still is. My now 2yo son’s primary attachment is with me because I cared for him from birth he cries when he see the mother, she took him to get welfare and free housing. With all the video and affidavits showing this, the court consultant and the family report writer still claim the attachment is with the mother, she enjoys abusing and neglecting him with the full knowledge and support of legal aids and the courts. They even write her affidavits for her (and got her name wrong in a signed and filed affidavit). My lawyer won’t talk to me, past on documents, file my affidavits making sure I don’t get a hearing at all. The reality is it is fully syndicated corruption, exploiting kids, stripping the father of their money. The courts and legal aid run list of their preferred consultants and lawyers, a genuine honest consultant or lawyer wouldn’t make it on their lists, and it is multibillion dollar industry, report writers are making ,000.00 a week, lawyers 20,000.00 a week, nice at the tax payers guaranteed expense.

Zaida Berrios, I am a woman and I support fathers. I am not a citizen of Australia. This is happening in America also.

xxxxxxxx, 3000 Equal Rights for all? More women in the board rooms? More women in the defence forces. More men should be acknowledged as fathers important in their children’s lives and often making a major contribution to their view and understanding of the world.-We can be engineers, electricians, doctors, dentists to rig workers, but some reason it seems that our ability to look after a child is diminished because we are men?

plupesype,

xxxxxxxx, 2617

Michelle Wilson, 3133 All laws should be equal, and we MUST put the children FIRST…

xxxxxxxx, 2850

xxxxxxxx, 4108 Why is it impossible (without many thousands spent on legal representation), to prove that DVO’s are totally against men, and indirectly against families too (children) even when it is stated in court that the facts of the order were not true or real?

steve, 4227 Parental Alienation is child abuse

richard pettit, 2316

Chris Savage, 4563 The Family and Federal Magistrates Courts are totally corrupt. They are an absolute disgrace and sponsor one of the most serious forms of child abuse – parental alienation.

Ben Bundy, 2540 How is the manipulation of children against their Father not seen as psycological abuse? How is it not picked up and why is it not acted on or ignored by social workers? Why do soicial workers see mothers by default as victims? Time for action by our government and law makers.

Charles, 44193, USA The family court of Australia, as well as that in the USA, are a disgrace and a mockery to true justice. But what the hell do they know about that?

Giuseppe Cutrale, 3500 There is no scientific evidence to support claims that a mother is more important to a child just a mindset and a mindset that needs to change for our children they are not weapons to aid in selfish acts of hate they are children who love there parents equally I have 5 children and 4 of which I have a shared care arrangement but for my youngest Daughter she has not seen myself or her brother or 3 sisters for 9 months easy to get an AVO or DVO in place with no proof how can a father just snap after 10 years of being a great dad I am and always will be the only father my children have I will always put there safety and well being above anything else but I will not stop until my daughter has her rights to see her family as we will also be getting our god given right to see her!

xxxxxxxx, 2046

Howard, UZFss0mkLTjW Males are human beings with rights just as women are. Stop this male hatred and destruction.

xxxxxxxx, 3178

Craig, 2487

james Dickenson,

Dr Greg Canning, 4812 Our children are suffering because of the gender biased and corrupt legal system and unaccountable family and federal magistrates courts. The divorce, family law and abuse industries extract billions of dollars to provide lucrative lifestyles for their practitioners at the expense of fathers and children.

Darren M, 5041 Expose the corrupt Family Court Judiciary. Hang and

fatima, 87300
hello, I have lost my father in Australian way who will help me to find him and either I can not continue my studies just help me as a humanity please

Katrina Hogan, 4164

Hagen Lunau, 2121
The revolution has begun. Time to drag the judges and politicians into the streets and punish them publicly.

Wayne Coles-Janess, 3000
How do we change this with no funds or influence?? Violence against Men and lack of proper procedures are ignored?

I have cared for our daughter since birth, while her mother placed her into “Childcare” the whole 50% of the time our daughter was in her mothers care for 5 years?

AUSTRALIA’S CORRUPT COURTS HATE CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN AND THEIR FATHERS

We need to take the fight to them.

Dear Senator Madigan
I listened with interest to your speech:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CAhTrniFPiM
Sadly there are a few small issues wrong.
David Collier is not a rather seemingly wonderful Judge at all, he is instrumental in a lot of the bad behaviour even assisting in creating and manipulating a case against the Fathers.
Diana Bryant is involved in the cover ups of all this.
Do I have the evidence – I sure do, and they know it. A lot of respectable people went to a lot of effort to nail them – this now is the most provable case against that court that has existed.
These people are very very frightened of me. Thats why I can publish this online and get away with it.
These links are the basis of what is what has now become a worldwide movement to bring the Court to its knees and prosecute these lot.
You can assist us or you can walk away – I am really not concerned.
Regards
Paul Rich
I would appreciate a reply one way or another.

Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee, Australian Human Rights Commission, EPP‏

Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee,

PO Box 6100, Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600.

Phone: +61 2 6277 3439 Fax: +61 2 6277 5809 fpa.sen@aph.gov.au

http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Finance_and_Public_Administration/Domestic_Violence

Cc

Australian Human Rights Commission

Level 3, 175 Pitt Street SYDNEY NSW 2000

GPO Box 5218 SYDNEY NSW 2001 Complaints Infoline: 1300 656 419 Complaint infoservice@humanrights.gov.au

http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Finance_and_Public_Administration/Domestic_Violence

Sunday, July 20, 2014

Dear Members

Parliamentary Inquiry into the Domestic Violence.

We thank the Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee for allowing us to present our submission to the Inquiry into Domestic Violence.

We note that the Committee’s terms of reference refers to “the prevalence and impact of domestic violence as it affects all Australians”. (underlining added).

The terms of reference then refers to “women” in four locations and “children” in one location. It does not specifically refer to “men” at all.

Our submission relates to all men, women and children.

We abhor genuine cases of domestic violence. This is, in relation to all men, women and children.

On 26 June 2014, the following matter was referred to the Finance and Public Administration References Committee for inquiry and report by the 27 October 2014:

  1. the prevalence and impact of domestic violence in Australia as it affects all Australians and, in particular, as it affects:
    1. women living with a disability, and
    2. women from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander backgrounds;
  2. the factors contributing to the present levels of domestic violence;
  3. the adequacy of policy and community responses to domestic violence;
  4. the effects of policy decisions regarding housing, legal services, and women‘s economic independence on the ability of women to escape domestic violence;
  5. how the Federal Government can best support, contribute to and drive the social, cultural and behavioural shifts required to eliminate violence against women and their children; and
  6. any other related matters.

This an affront and blatant indictment of senate members, discrimination act against the male gender.

5  Sex discrimination

(1)  For the purposes of this Act, a person (in this subsection referred to as the discriminator) discriminates against another person (in this subsection referred to as the aggrieved person) on the ground of the sex of the aggrieved person if, by reason of:

(a)  the sex of the aggrieved person;

“women and their children”

I must insist that the committee publish my submission on indictment have been implied by the High Court from these parts of the Constitution. It is established that the Constitution protects ‘freedom of political communication’ or, in other words, the right of Australians to communicate freely with each other and with their elected representatives about political and public affairs.

The Parliament and government are linked in the relationship known as ‘responsible government’, which was described earlier. For this reason, we consider them together. These are powerful institutions, which control the law-making process.

Potentially, they protect rights in two ways: positively, by passing laws to protect rights that are not currently protected and negatively, by restraining themselves from making laws to infringe rights that are recognized by the common law or international law.

  • CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 28 Interfering with political liberty Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise or performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence.

Penalty: Imprisonment for 3 years.

A person is incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a Member if he or she has been convicted of bribery, undue influence or interference with political liberty, or has been found by the Court of Disputed Returns to have committed or attempted to commit bribery or undue influence when a candidate, disqualification being for two years from the date of the conviction or finding.

Submissions closing date is 31 July 2014. The reporting date is 27 October 2014.

http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp/partner-abuse-state-of-knowledge-project-the-gold-standard-of-domestic-violence-information/

Family Violence

May 24, 2013 by Robert Franklin, Esq.

It’s perhaps the most important event in the history of domestic violence research. Back in 2010, the senior editor of the journal Partner Abuse asked 42 researchers in the field of intimate partner abuse to conduct a thorough review of existing literature on the subject. All peer reviewed literature from 1990 to the present was examined and over 1,700 studies were included in the final analysis. The scientists divided their inquiry into 17 subject areas and assigned researchers to each. The resulting analyses were published by Partner Abuse between April, 2012 and April, 2013, and together comprise almost 2,700 pages of information including tables. The whole project is called the Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project (PASK).

The purpose of this massive effort was to once and for all bring sound scientific methods to the field of DV research, one in which sound science has often been sorely lacking. As the introduction makes clear, the authors believe that everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts. And it is those facts on which public policy should be based “rather than ideology and special interests.”

That of course is arrant heresy as far as the domestic violence movement is concerned. For decades now, DV activists have substituted political ideology for facts and the scientific method. Unsurprisingly, they’ve been wrong about almost everything they’ve ever said about domestic violence. Like the Cross to a vampire, science has always threatened the domestic violence establishment, its cherished worldview, its fear and loathing of men and ultimately its lavish governmental funding.

PASK should (and well may) prove to be the stake in the heart of what has for far too long been our public policy on intimate partner violence. Simply put, no one who speaks, writes or legislates on the subject should do so without first reading at least the 62-page Overview of Findings, and preferably the whole analysis. PASK is the state of the art on domestic violence.

The project isn’t over. As more research is conducted (hopefully in the areas suggested by the authors) PASK findings will change. And in some areas, there is either not enough data (e.g. injuries to male victims), or the data are inconclusive, so public policy changes aren’t possible. But in most areas of inquiry, the facts are clear and must be used to guide policy makers. To do anything else would be to abandon even the pretense that the goal of public policy is actually the reduction in rates of intimate partner violence.

To be clear, what PASK reveals is that the claims of the domestic violence establishment are wrong and have been from the start. That establishment that receives such largess from governments and private sources has been revealed once and for all to be intellectually bankrupt.

Section One: Rates of Male and Female Victimization. The group studying information in this area analyzed 249 publications comprising over 1 million subjects. They found that, over their lifetimes, about 23% of women reported physical victimization versus 19.3% of men. Those figures will likely converge over time given the fact that more men than women reported victimization over the previous year. Gender symmetry in victimization appeared in aggregated data from numerous different countries including the U.S., Canada, the U.K., New Zealand and South Africa.

As to public policy, the authors stated the obvious:

This comprehensive review… documents the need for gender-inclusive responsiveness to this wide-ranging public health problem. In particular, there are currently few services for male victims and the high rates of violence experienced by women and men suggests a need for treatment and intervention strategies for victims of both sexes.

In other words, the roughly half of all DV victims who are men have nowhere to turn for help, and they need it.

Section Two: Rates of Male and Female Perpetration. The authors studying data in this area analyzed 111 separate data sets comprising about 250,000 subjects. They found that about 25% of those subjects reported perpetrating physical violence against a current partner or one in their last relationship. That represented 28.3% of women and 21.6% of men who perpetrated violence against an intimate partner. Subjects came from across the industrialized, English-speaking world.

The authors note that “gendered explanations of IPV do not adequately account for our findings.” Of course the DV establishment will hasten to say that rates of perpetration of domestic violence don’t deal with the severity of violence, only the incidence.

True, but the authors anticipate that argument.

[F]indings should be used to support the development and implementation of interventions that acknowledge the use of violence by women in intimate relationships but also recognized how participants’ treatment needs may differ.

That is, difference in the severity of domestic violence should no longer be used by the DV establishment as an excuse to deny services to male victims or female perpetrators. Those interventions should be tailored to the needs of those victims and perpetrators.

Section Three: Rates of Bi-Directional and Uni-Directional IPV. In this area, 50 separate studies that recorded rates of bi-directional versus uni-directional violence were analyzed. Researchers found that, in the largest samples studied, among couples reporting domestic violence, 57.9% reported reciprocal or bi-directional violence with the remainder, 42.1% reporting uni-directional violence. In the uni-directional group, women were over twice as likely (28.3%) to perpetrate violence as were men (13.8%).

Smaller samples revealed similar rates of bi-directional violence but community surveys showed 22.9% of women versus 17.5% of men perpetrating uni-directional violence. Among subjects in high school and college, 31.9% of women perpetrated uni-directional violence versus 16.2% of men.

Only in the sample of U.S. military personnel and “at-risk” males did men’s (43.4%) uni-directional violence rates outstrip those of women (17.3%).

The researchers make clear that, in all samples, the salient feature is the prevalence of bi-directional IPV. That means that, if a doctor, hospital or any other reporter finds evidence of domestic violence victimization, the chance of DV perpetration by the same person is good. Rates of bi-directional IPV among gay men and lesbian women didn’t differ significantly from those of heterosexual couples.

Likewise, rates of bi-directional DV were almost identical for white and Hispanic couples, i.e. about 50% for each. African-American couples on the other hand reported a rate of about 62% bi-directional IPV. The ratio of female-on-male/male-on-female uni-directional IPV was 2.27 for African-Americans, 2.26 for whites and 1.34 for Hispanic couples.

I’ll write more about this valuable body of work at a later time.

The National Parents Organization is a Shared Parenting Organization

The National Parents Organization is a non-profit organization that is educating the public, families, educators, and legislators about the importance of shared parenting and how it can reduce conflict in children, parents and extended families. If you would like to get involved in our organization, you can do so several ways. First, we would love to have you as an official member of the National Parents Organization team. Second, the National Parents Organization is an organization that believes in the importance of using social media as a means to spread the word about shared parenting and other topics, and you can visit us on our Facebook Page to learn more about our efforts. Last, we hope you will share this article with other families using the many social networking sites so that we can bring about greater awareness of shared parenting. Thank you for your support.

Australian Human Rights Commission

Posted on May 20, 2014 by Kids First – Children’s Rights Activists (CRA)

As you may be well aware of the antisocial discrimination against males that has arisen, I need to bring a complaint of very wrongful belief of women and the Australian Human Rights Commission, that children belong to women.

I must make complaint to you as Australian Human Rights Commission.

Males are violated and abused nearly as much as females, discriminated against more, females violate and abuse children more than males do, equates to most DV is perpetrated by women.

Inquiry into the Family Law Legislation Amendment (Family Violence and Other Measures) Bill 2011

5. The Commission commends the actions that the Australian Government is taking to combat family violence and child abuse, including the National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children 2009-2020, the National Plan to Reduce Violence against Women and “their” Children 2010-2022 and the development of a national scheme for recognition of domestic violence orders across Australian jurisdictions. These initiatives evidence the ongoing commitment of the Australian government to this area.

https://www.humanrights.gov.au/inquiry-family-law-legislation-amendment-family-violence-and-other-measures-bill-2011

Australia Concise Oxford dictionary Fifth Edition; P1496 “their” … belonging to them or themselves.

This is in breach of Article 4 and unlawful as it enslaves children to women …

This is a serious repeated indictment of antisocial discrimination by AHRC ‘women and their children their property’ enslaving victimizing children.

Enslavers on breach of Article 4 of the UDHR states that ‘No one shall be held in slavery or servitude: slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms’.

Slavery was the first human rights issue to arouse wide international concern yet it still continues today. Slavery like practices remains a grave and persistent problem today.

The mandate on contemporary forms of slavery includes but is not limited to issues such as: debt bondage, serfdom, forced labour, child slavery, sexual slavery, forced or early marriages and the sale of wives. As a legally permitted labour system, traditional slavery has been abolished everywhere, but it has not been completely stamped out.

There are still reports of slave markets. Even when abolished, slavery leaves traces. It can persist as a state of mind- among victims and their descendants and among the inheritors of those who practised it –long after it has formally ended.

Slavery-like practices are often clandestine. This makes it difficult to have a clear picture of the scale of the contemporary slavery, let alone to uncover, punish or eliminate it.

The majority of those who suffer are the poorest, most vulnerable and marginalised social groups in society. Fear, ignorance of one’s rights and the need to survive do not encourage them to speak out.

In order to effectively eradicate slavery in all its forms, the root causes of slavery such as poverty, social exclusion and all forms of discrimination must be addressed. In addition, we need to promote and protect the rights of all especially the most vulnerable in our society. Where human rights violations have already been committed, we are called upon to help restore the dignity of victims. http://www.ohchr.org/…/srslavery/pages/srslaveryindex.aspx

I wait your compliance common law, humans and children’s right treaties .

Steven C Wickenden

Fathers Australia, formally Fathers Union of Australia, formally fathers Australia. http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp/

 

There is another Parliamentary Inquiry. This one is on domestic violence in Australia.

Hi to Everyone.
There is another Parliamentary Inquiry. This one is on domestic violence in Australia.
The following details may be possibly of interest to you.
The closing date for submissions is 31 July 2014.
I have also attached a copy of our submission to the Inquiry.
Regards
John.

John Flanagan,

Deputy Registered Officer,

Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting),

PO Box 57,

THIRROUL.. NSW. 2515.

Mobile 0415 899 574.

Email: noncustod@yahoo.com.au

17 July 2014.

 

 

Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee, PO Box 6100, Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600.

Phone: +61 2 6277 3439 Fax: +61 2 6277 5809 fpa.sen@aph.gov.au

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Parliamentary Inquiry into the Domestic Violence.

 

We thank the Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee for allowing us to present our submission to the Inquiry into Domestic Violence.

 

We note that the Committee’s terms of reference refers to “the prevalence and impact of domestic violence as it affects all Australians”. (underlining added).

 

The terms of reference then refers to “women” in four locations and “children” in one location. It does not specifically refer to “men” at all.

 

Our submission relates to all men, women and children.

 

We abhor genuine cases of domestic violence. This is, in relation to all men, women and children.

 

Family Violence

 

Domestic violence is about power and control. There are many ways this control can be expressed. Domestic violence can also happen in many forms, including physical, emotional, economic and psychological violence. One form of psychological violence is withholding access to children.

 

Family violence is simply a form of domestic violence.

 

An easily-made family violence allegation will give one parent, normally the mother, a significant advantage. This is both in terms of custody and also financial benefits.

 

There is a direct and significant link between an application for a family violence order* (AVO, protection order, restraining order or intervention order – please see below for more details) and the contact and residence arrangements later made for children of separated families.

 

Sole custody then brings with it significant financial gains. These financial gains include

increased social security payments, child support payments and property settlements.

 

Procedure to Obtain Sole Custody of Children and to Cause Psychological Violence.

 

The procedure to obtain sole custody of the children and to cause psychological violence is as follows:-

 

1. An application for a family violence order* is made in the local court in NSW (or in the magistrates court in the other states and territories) or at the local police station.

 

2. The police with their limited resources will usually not investigate the allegations. As a result, the allegations will usually remain unproved during later court proceedings.

 

3. When the matter comes to court, the police prosecutor will then pressure the alleged offender to accept a family violence order “without admission”. This is a trap.

 

4. Once an order for a family violence order has been made, the initiating parent will then make an application for residence and contact orders in the Family Court/Federal Circuit Court.

 

5. Under section 60CC of the Family Law Act 1975, any issues of violence will be sufficient reason to restrict or, in some cases, prevent all contact by the Family Court/Federal Circuit Court.

 

6. This establishes effective sole custody of the children for the custodial parent. This then goes “hand in hand” with increased child support payments and larger property settlement payouts.

 

Conclusion

 

As stated above, we abhor incidents of genuine domestic violence. The perpetrators of

these incidents, once proven to be guilty, should be strongly dealt with by the due process of law.

 

However the temptation to misuse a family violence order is very often too great for some parents.

 

We believe that children from separated families should have the right of contact with both parents.

 

Our legislators are doing nothing about this problem – that is with regard to the implementation of a rebuttable presumption of equal time shared parenting into the Family Law legislation.

 

Therefore, the real reasons for domestic violence are often disguised behind more significant problems in our overall system.

 

 

Our Recommendations are:

 

  1. Implement the rebuttable presumption of equal time shared parenting into the Family Law legislation.
  2. Initiate a series of strategies around data collection & awareness of men and women experiencing domestic violence.
  3. Include in any hospital data collection, to include fathers or husbands, who are abused or have attempted suicide.
  4. Have the Police Intervention Team collect similar data within the suicide and self-harm programmes.
  5. Arrange for the state health departments to have fathers being asked about domestic violence – similar to women.
  6. Have the Family Court/Federal Circuit Court and the Child Support Programme (formerly known as the Child Support Agency) recognise, as psychological violence, withholding access to children.     Deputy Registered Officer,http://www.equalparenting.org.au
  7. *  Family violence orders have different names in different states and territories.       These names are as follows:-
  8. Non-Custodial Parents Party.
  9. John Flanagan,
  10. Yours faithfully,
  • Queensland – Protection orders
  • New South Wales – Apprehended violence orders
  • Victoria – Intervention orders
  • Australian Capital Territory – Protection orders
  • Northern Territory – Domestic violence orders
  • South Australia – Intervention orders
  • Western Australia – Violence restraining orders
  • Tasmania – Family violence orders

Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project the Gold Standard of Domestic Violence Information

Your experience with an Independent Children’s Lawyer (ICL): Survey

independent-childrens-lawyer

Independent Children’s Lawyers (ICLs) are assigned by the Courts to specifically and solely represent the best interests and rights of the children in the midst of a child custody or child contact dispute.

This may be the logic, however a lot of questions have been raised as to the quality of representation, the effectiveness of that representation, and knowledge and skill of the legal practitioners assigned, and the independence of these legal practitioners from ideologies that may compromise their effectiveness.

These concerns have been so significant the Australian government has recently assigned the Australian Institute of Family Studies to research into how ICLs could be better and more effectively utilised within the Court process.

Here we survey parents who have gone through the child custody dispute process and were assigned an ICL, to rate their experience.

What has been your experience with Independent Children’s Lawyer?

FAMILY COURT JURIES

 

The Voice of The Australian Constitution – Supporting Documents

A “Court” is a “place where Justice is administered”. “Justice” is “the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs”. The Right to Trial by Jury belongs to everyone. It is inalienable, ie: it can neither be taken away nor given away. In any action in any Court, there must be the clear and unequivocal consent by both parties to be without a Jury – otherwise, the Court has no Jurisdiction to proceed summarily (which means “without a Jury”). Should a Court try to proceed without such consent, the Jurisdiction of the Court must be Challenged – whereupon only a Special Jury will decide whether Australians have the Right to Trial by Jury.

 

The Family Court, as it is presently constituted, is not a “Court” because the Right to Trial by Jury is being unlawfully denied. The Family Court is a “Den of Inequity” that exacerbates wrong and injury….. “in the place of Justice wickedness is there”.

 

It is the Democratic Right of every Australian to be able to access Trial by Jury for redress and remedy. If both parties to an action do not want to have a Jury Trial, then both must sign a Memorandum of Consent to that fact, and a Judge can hear, try and determine the case.

 

Also presently, the Family Court (by way of Judges) administers Statute Law which are merely Acts of Parliament and often the product of vested interest groups within the Parliament or the result of pressure being exerted by militant or mischievous groups upon the Parliament. Under the Australian Constitution, there are 3 Arms of Government, ie: the Executive; the Parliament; and the Judicature. Australian Judges are part of the Executive Arm of Government because they are appointed by the Crown of the United Kingdom, ie: Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second. [This is a matter for resolution at another time].

 

“Judicature” means “the administration of Justice”, and the 19th century framers of the Australian Constitution knew what they were doing by using that word. They knew that the Judiciary, or “body of Judges”, is of the Executive Arm of Government and the presence of Judges in a Court is to ensure that the Judgments of Juries are carried out by employing the facilities under and at the disposal of the Executive, such as the Sheriff, the Departments of Police, Correction, etc..

 

Section 118 of the Australian Constitution guarantees that all Australians should enjoy all the Rights and Privileges as set out in the “Charters of Liberty”, ie: Magna Carta 1215; Petition of Right 1627; Habeas Corpus 1640; Bill of Rights 1688; etc., which became entrenched Constitutional Enactments in Australia in 1828, because of the likes of men such as William Charles Wentworth and others who transformed Australia from a Penal Colony under a military Governor into a country where Englishmen could be as free as if they were in England.

 

Fathers committing suicide as a result of Family Court Injustice is a senseless tragedy. Kids in Distress as a result of Family Court Injustice is an offence against the nation … all for the lack of knowledge ……. knowledge as to what is the Rule of Law.

 

It is the paramount duty and responsibility of a Jury to not only determine what are the facts but what is the law, to judge the justice of the law, to decide if the law is appropriately being applied, to judge the moral intentions of the parties, and to vote for a judgment entirely according to their conscience. This was known to our forefathers – but we have not been taught this Truth. Now, because of the arrival of the Internet, we can discover what has been withheld from us.

 

One party to a Family Court action may well decide that the existing Statutes are to their advantage – while the other party must believe that the Statutes are unfair. The Statutes are Acts of Parliament given Royal assent by the Executive. Judges are of the Executive to “well and truly serve” the Executive. However, “Law and Justice are not synonymous because a Law can be unjust” is a Legal Maxim.

 

Meet the ‘latte pappas’: The Swedish men who stay home to look after the children

This Story sent to us Thanks to Hans Ekblad

Sweden is the land of the stay at home dad and if you walk the streets of Stockholm you are bound to spot them. The Feed speaks with one Aussie dad who says he has it so good in Sweden he wouldn’t live back home.

They’re known as the latte pappas – the thousands of Swedish men who each year take substaintial leave to help with the rearing of their children while mums return to work.

Andrew Gillard is an Australian father who is living in Sweden with his wife Sara and their three children.

Andrew and Sara’s first two children were born in Australia with the third born in Sweden.

Sweden has some of the most progressive social policies in the world and since the 1970s the Swedish government has made it possible for both parents to take time off with pay to raise their kids.

“Here in Sweden the parental leave is a right, it’s a law,” says Andrew. “It’s basically the parents who decide who’s going to be the one to stay at home.”

“You do get a lot of dad’s who are basically pushing prams around.”

null

Swedish parents receive a generous 480 days paid leave per child that’s around 68 weeks paid at 80 per cent replacement wage.

The leave is shared between the parents and fathers must take at least two months.

This means every dad – from top CEOs to janitors – take substantial time off to share parenting responsibilities.

Andrew says it’s not uncommon to see a lot of young fathers looking after their children in a local cafe.

“You probably wouldn’t see the same thing happening in Australia,” says Andrew. “You’ve got four or five guys all around 30 years old pushing a pram, going into a cafe, and having a latte.”

“It’d probably look quite strange if you were doing that in suburban Melbourne for example.”

null

Sweden’s policy has been in place since the 70s and the impact is significant – about 80 per cent of Swedish mothers work, compared to just over 60 per cent in Australia.Abbott’s proposed Paid Parental Leave will give mothers 26 weeks paid leave at full salary capped at $100,000 dollars.

It allows for just 2 weeks out of the 26 to be taken by the father at his full replacement wage up to $150,000.

Damien Arnup is a stay-at-home dad in Australia who decided to be a full-time parent because his wife has the ability to earn more.

He says paid parental leave is really important for new parents who need to spend time with their children.

“Speaking to some people and their like ‘oh it’s daddy day today’ and I’m like it’s daddy day seven days a week,” says Damien. “Being able to have that time with your family and with your children is absolutely crucial.”

“The Swedish system… would benefit families here in Australia because everyone’s situation is different.”

“It’s a very short part of your life and… if you don’t get to be involved you’re really missing out.”

And while Sweden does pay high rates of tax – Andrew and Sara say it all helps to cover schemes that will benefit the children.

“I suppose people do take advantage of it, but then it’s there to be taken advantage of,” says Andrew. “At the end result the winner is the child.”

Join the conversation by following The Feed on Facebook and Twitter.

Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs

Parliament of Australia

House of Representatives

Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs

Thursday, July 03, 2014

Dear Members,

50/50 shared care is the civilised standard.

I write to you with deep sincerity and concern, at as to the health and wellbeing of children in these circumstances.

  • linkages between Family Court decisions and Child Support’s policies and processes; and
  • how the scheme could provide better outcomes for high conflict families.

“Family Court decisions” Oppression and Tyranny

From my 4 year experience with the Australian Family court judiciaries and associated bureaucracies, there is absolutely no rule of law or accountability, only an absolute maniacal sociopathic narcisstic lust for power and money.

I am witness to cronyism, corruption, abuse, misconduct and misbehaviour from Brisbane family court judges oldest and newest, reputably the most corrupt judiciary in Australia.

Corrupt ICL lawyers, family report writers, pseudo experts and practitioners, this is a dysfunctional criminally corrupt secret industry kept a corrupt secret with 121 FLA, ICL Child Lawyer and consultant’s purger to obstruct pervert and defeat justice.

In secret courts with NO juries, Our Children, our families, our culture, our future under attack from within, organised crime, graft, profiting from crime and judicial corruption ambush psychological war against Australian Children and Families, with destructive and lethal consequences’.

If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter. George Washington (22 February1732 – 14 December1799)

It is an antisocial psyche war on children and families aimed at defeating justice for power and profit, thousands of Australian families are victimised, trapped every year.

Until there is true public accountability of judiciaries, bureaucracies and associate you are ‘pissing against the wind’

WE MUST CHANGE THIS FOR OUR CHILDREN AND NATIONAL BEST INTEREST, ONLY PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY WORKS, DEMOCRACY AND JURIES.

50/50 shared care is the civilised standard.

If for no good reason one parent works against 50/50 it could be said they are being dysfunctional, antisocial and should be assessed for personality disorder APD NPD.

Stop graft, exploitation and abuse in the child trafficking industry.

  1. Repeal rescind revoke and annul 121. Family Law Act (FLA) their iron curtain secret gag law stopping communication with the Australian public, covering corruption exploitation and abuse.
  2. Open the court objective truth, juries on appeals, not subjective bigoted parasitic judiciaries.
  3. Abolish legal aid. Stop funding corrupt illicit sex discrimination. Legal Aid should be nothing more than a self help webpage, not slush funds for politically violent corrupt law firms.
  4. Hold public employees to account, to the public, by the public, for the public.

Sincerely

Fathers Australia formally Fathers Union of Australia.

http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp/

The Committee will inquire and report on the following:

  • methods used by Child Support to collect payments in arrears and manage overpayments;
  • whether the child support system is flexible enough to accommodate the changing circumstances of families;
  • the alignment of the child support and family assistance frameworks;
  • linkages between Family Court decisions and Child Support’s policies and processes; and
  • how the scheme could provide better outcomes for high conflict families.

As part of this inquiry, the Committee has a particular interest in:

  • assessing the methodology for calculating payments and the adequacy of current compliance and enforcement powers for the management of child support payments;
  • the effectiveness of mediation and counselling arrangements as part of family assistance frameworks; and
  • ensuring that children in high conflict families are best provided for under the child support scheme.

In carrying out this review, the Committee should assess whether any problems experienced by payers or payees of child support impact on the majority of parents and other carers involved in the system, or a minority, and make recommendations accordingly (e.g. there may be a case for specialised processes and supports for some parents meeting certain criteria).

Committee, SPLAChildSupport (REPS)

Thank you for your submission to the Parliamentary Inquiry into the Child Support Program. The Committee has considered your submission,and hasdecided to publish it online.

All accepted submissions to Parliamentary inquiries have the protection of parliamentary privilege. Publication of your submission includes it being loaded onto the internet (with your signature and/or contact details removed) and being available to other interested parties including the media.

Your name may have been withheld from the published version of your submission either at your request or at the discretion of the Committee. If you would like to know what number your submission is, please contact the Secretariat.

If your contribution contains confidential material and you have concerns about it being published, please email the secretariat as soon as possible at childsupport.reps@aph.gov.au.

Individuals are also encouraged to complete the questionnaire. All responses to the questionnaire will be provided directly to the Committee.

If you have any questions regarding your submission or the inquiry, please contact the Committee Secretariat.

Parliamentary inquiry into the Child Support Program

(02) 6277 2223 | www.aph.gov.au/ChildSupport | PO Box 6021 Parliament House ACT 2600

Parliament of Australia House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs

Saturday, July 19, 2014

Dear Members, As I have had nil response from my previous email.

I must insist that the committee publish my submission on indictment have been implied by the High Court from these parts of the Constitution. It is established that the Constitution protects ‘freedom of political communication’ or, in other words, the right of Australians to communicate freely with each other and with their elected representatives about political and public affairs.

The Parliament and government are linked in the relationship known as ‘responsible government’, which was described earlier. For this reason, we consider them together. These are powerful institutions, which control the law-making process.

Potentially, they protect rights in two ways: positively, by passing laws to protect rights that are not currently protected and negatively, by restraining themselves from making laws to infringe rights that are recognized by the common law or international law.

  •    CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 28 Interfering with political liberty Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise or performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence.

Penalty: Imprisonment for 3 years.

A person is incapable of being chosen or of sitting as a Member if he or she has been convicted of bribery, undue influence or interference with political liberty, or has been found by the Court of Disputed Returns to have committed or attempted to commit bribery or undue influence when a candidate, disqualification being for two years from the date of the conviction or finding.

I wait your compliance.

Steven C Wickenden

Fathers Australia, formally Fathers Union of Australia, formally fathers Australia.

http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp

Committee, SPLAChildSupport (REPS)

Dear Mr Wickenden,

Your submission has been published online. It is submission n.90, and is available at this page: http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Social_Policy_and_Legal_Affairs/Child_Support_Program/Submissions

Regards,

Thomas

Inquiry Secretary

Parliamentary inquiry into the Child Support Program

(02) 6277 2223 | www.aph.gov.au/ChildSupport | PO Box 6021 Parliament House ACT 2600

 

Tomorrows Town Hall sydney Lukesarmy protest 1pm 06 07 2014

Save Medicare Campaign Sydney's photo.

Just getting ready for tomorrows town hall protest. Lukesarmy and the Abused children will also be represented Too!. Help is Needed in handing Flyers, & talking to the Public . Just look for the yellow & purple ABUSED Children Flag .

The office of AC/DC Foundation. will have A table & a P.A. and much more sett up tomorrow. YOUR HELP is NEEDED for the Voiceless Children, handing out flyers & talking to the Public,PLease HELP ???.

Parliamentary Inquiry into the Child Support Program

The deadline to make submissions to the Parliamentary Child Support Inquiry has now been extended to Friday 4 July 2014.
If it helps, our understanding is that this inquiry will be about whether the existing system should be changed. We believe that the following six (6) changes should be made. These issues are listed below.
1. Child support should be based on net income and not gross income.
2. Overtime should be excluded from child support.
3. There should be a fairer cap on the maximum income to determine child support payments.
4. The payer should not be penalised if the payee chooses not to work. This is when the payee has the ability to do so.
5. Court-ordered custody arrangements should determine child support payments – not claims by the payee.
6. As a general comment, the child support system should be fairer
Your support (if you have not already done so) is encouraged by snding in your submission by 4 July 2014.
http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/House/Social_Policy_and_Legal_Affairs/Child_Support_Program
Public Hearings.
Note – anyone can attend a public hearing and also give a three (3) minute talk to the Committee. This is during the Community Sessions. We would suggest that you take this important opportunity.
Future Public Hearing Dates (already held in Canberra (26 June 2014) and Sydney (27 June 2014)).
17 Jul 2014 – Canberra (2), ACT.
18 Jul 2014 – Melbourne, VIC.
21 Jul 2014 – Newcastle, NSW.
22 Jul 2014 – Queensland, QLD.
23 Jul 2014 – Mackay, QLD.
04 Aug 2014 – Adelaide, SA
05 Aug 2014 – Perth, WA.
06 Aug 2014 – Karratha, WA.
TBA – Ballarat, VIC.
TBA – Hobart, TAS.
Regards
John Flanagan
Non-Custodial Parents Party (Equal Parenting)