$21,000,000,000 AUD PA 100,000 LAWYERS, BARBARISUM NO RULE OF LAW it is literally the Manson family on $21,000,000,000 Billion Dollar organised crime spree by way of fraud on steroids, lie cheat slander seal, in full knowledge, consent and facilitated by … Continue reading
The AIFS Ethics Committee
The Commonwealth Ombudsman
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs
The Australian Human Rights Commission
Monday, 1 September 2014
The Parliament and government are linked in the relationship known as ‘responsible government’.
AIFS seminar series presentation Unlawful discrimination, fraud against Australia Children and Families
I must make complaint to you of Fraud and discrimination, Heather Nancarrow
“Building evidence to support the reduction of violence against women and children.”
“Violence against Women and their Children”
The Institute has defined fraud against the Commonwealth as:
“Dishonestly obtaining a benefit or causing a loss by deception or other means”.
As you may be well aware of the antisocial discrimination against males that has arisen, I need to bring a complaint of very wrongful fraudulent assertion by way of deception, these women, that children belong to women.
Males are violated and abused nearly as much by females, discriminated against more, women violate and abuse children more than males do, equates to most DV is perpetrated by women.
Complaint towards Australian Human Rights Commission as well
5. The Commission commends the actions that the Australian Government is taking to combat family violence and child abuse, including the National Framework for Protecting Australia’s Children 2009-2020, the National Plan to Reduce Violence against Women and “their” Children 2010-2022 and the development of a national scheme for recognition of domestic violence orders across Australian jurisdictions. These initiatives evidence the ongoing commitment of the Australian government to this area. https://www.humanrights.gov.au/inquiry-family-law-legislation-amendment-family-violence-and-other-measures-bill-2011
It clear this industry is based on discrimination, and slandering people of the community, for the purpose slandering people is extremely profitable for lawyers and practitioners.
Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project the Gold Standard of Domestic Violence Information
It’s perhaps the most important event in the history of domestic violence research. Back in 2010, the senior editor of the journal Partner Abuse asked 42 researchers in the field of intimate partner abuse to conduct a thorough review of existing literature on the subject.
All peer reviewed literature from 1990 to the present was examined and over 1,700 studies were included in the final analysis. The scientists divided their inquiry into 17 subject areas and assigned researchers to each.
The resulting analyses were published by Partner Abuse between April, 2012 and April, 2013, and together comprise almost 2,700 pages of information including tables. The whole project is called the Partner Abuse State of Knowledge Project (PASK).
Concise Oxford dictionary Fifth Edition; P1496 “their” … belonging to them or themselves.
This is in breach of Article 4 and unlawful as it enslaves children to women …
This is a serious repeated indictment of antisocial discrimination by AHRC ‘women and their children their property’ enslaving victimizing children.
Enslavers on breach of Article 4 of the UDHR states that ‘No one shall be held in slavery or servitude: slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms’.
Slavery was the first human rights issue to arouse wide international concern yet it still continues today. Slavery like practices remains a grave and persistent problem today.
The mandate on contemporary forms of slavery includes but is not limited to issues such as: debt bondage, serfdom, forced labor, child slavery, sexual slavery, forced or early marriages and the sale of wives. As a legally permitted labor system, traditional slavery has been abolished everywhere, but it has not been completely stamped out.
There are still reports of slave markets. Even when abolished, slavery leaves traces. It can persist as a state of mind- among victims and their descendants and among the inheritors of those who practiced it –long after it has formally ended.
Slavery-like practices are often clandestine. This makes it difficult to have a clear picture of the scale of the contemporary slavery, let alone to uncover, punish or eliminate it.
The majorities of those who suffer are the poorest, most vulnerable and marginalized social groups in society. Fear, ignorance of one’s rights and the need to survive do not encourage them to speak out.
In order to effectively eradicate slavery in all its forms, the root causes of slavery such as poverty, social exclusion and all forms of discrimination must be addressed. In addition, we need to promote and protect the rights of all especially the most vulnerable in our society.
Where human rights violations have already been committed, we are called upon to help restore the dignity of victims.
(1) For the purposes of this Act, a person (in this subsection referred to as the discriminator) discriminates against another person (in this subsection referred to as the aggrieved person) on the ground of the sex of the aggrieved person if, by reason of:
(a) the sex of the aggrieved person;
(b) a characteristic that appertains generally to persons of the sex of the aggrieved person; or
(c) a characteristic that is generally imputed to persons of the sex of the aggrieved person;
the discriminator treats the aggrieved person less favorably than, in circumstances that are the same or are not materially different, the discriminator treats or would treat a person of a different sex.
(2) For the purposes of this Act, a person (the discriminator) discriminates against another person (the aggrieved person) on the ground of the sex of the aggrieved person if the discriminator imposes, or proposes to impose, a condition, requirement or practice that has, or is likely to have, the effect of disadvantaging persons of the same sex as the aggrieved person.
Ethics Committee and role
The AIFS Ethics Committee is a Human Research Ethics Committee registered with the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC).
Role To ensure that the ethical standards outlined in the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Research Involving Humans, and elaborated in the Institute’s ethics statement, Ethical Issues in the Research Process (1996), are met in all research projects undertaken by the Institute. To ensure that projects meet the three key principles of respect for persons, beneficence, and justice, as set down in the National Statement.
The committee meets to consider: new project proposals; receive brief oral and written reports on ongoing projects; consider any complaints or problems that may have arisen regarding ethical issues in Institute research; and review the complaints procedures.
My Point in Case
I have been in Family Court Bne for 4 years; my 5 year old son has been denied contact with me since November 2012, except for 1 hour supervised contact in 2013.
We were put into supervised contact 1 hour per week because my son had a secure attachment with m and an insecure attachment with the respondent mother.
The FCA employee’s including Judges; LAQ legal aid practitioners including lawyers, psychiatrist, psychologist, social workers lie and cheat with impunity.
Family Court Australia has degenerated into nothing more than $21 Billion Dollar AUD per annum organised crime spree, by way of this very kind of discrimination and fraud.
SigmaX Consulting Pty Ltd part 35. 35.
The use of domestic violence claims in this instance, where the mother maintained on interview that there was none, would be indicative to any reasonable person that significant power structures were at work opposing one’s reunification with one’s child.
Those reasonable persons would regard as being, in all the circumstances, fraud, menacing, harassing, offensive, oppressive, tyrannical and unlawful.
As has been proven my young son is being exploited and abused, in breach of his inalienably rights.
Fraud against my son, Fraud against the state, Fraud against the Commonwealth, criminal abuse, criminal negligence and political violence.
Those whom is aware that corruption exists in and failed to take any action, and needs to be in least removed from employ, in full knowledge and has degenerated into nothing more than organised fraud.
Australia Government is in Breech of my son’s rights signed treaty Australia and the Convention on the Rights of the Child Australian Human Rights Commission any breech of this treaty is a serious indictment on Australian government and unlawful.
Steven C Wickenden
Surfers Paradise Gold Coast Australia
Please note this is a political communication, and as such all content is lawful open publication under the protection of
On indictment have been implied by the High Court from these parts of the Constitution.
It is established that the Constitution protects ‘freedom of political communication’ or, in other words, the right of Australians to communicate freely with each other and with their elected representatives about political and public affairs.
CRIMES ACT 1914 – SECT 28 Interfering with political liberty Any person who, by violence or by threats or intimidation of any kind, hinders or interferes with the free exercise or performance, by any other person, of any political right or duty, shall be guilty of an offence.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 3 years.
- Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS) in the National Action Plan
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
- Senator Online has just recently started an official PARTY MEMBERSHIP DRIVE
- The Federal Senate Inquiry into Children in Care in Australia 2014 Submission
- We need to take the fight to them.
- Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee, Australian Human Rights Commission, EPP
- There is another Parliamentary Inquiry. This one is on domestic violence in Australia.
- Your experience with an Independent Children’s Lawyer (ICL): Survey
- FAMILY COURT JURIES