HIGH COURT CORRUPTION REVEALED CORRUPTION REVEALED

Fight Child Protection Department Corruption:

 HIGH COURT CORRUPTION REVEALED CORRUPTION REVEALED

This is a media release which explains the connection between the (corrupt as in acting illegally) Australian High Court and the Family Court.

Thousands of Australian parents are having their children taken illegally from them, as well as property, by illegal, corrupt orders in the Family Court.  This must stop. The High Court is the one to do it – and it is refusing to do so.

…..NEWS RELEASE …… 07/02/2014 …… NEWS RELEASE…. 07/02/2014 …
HIGH COURT CORRUPTION REVEALED

For the first time in Australian history, corruption has been revealed in the High Court.
Australians’ direct access to review by the High Court is guaranteed by our Constitution and it is being refused.
This week Australian Deputy Prime Minister Truss asked High Court Chief Justice French to file a case against corrupt judges, some of them in the High Court itself (letter attached).
Earlier, High Court judges Keifel, Bell and Crennan each defied the Australian Constitution to refuse three applicants their right to justice under section 75 (v). This is corruption at the highest level, according to legal definition of the term.
The case has implications for all Australians, many of whom are unaware that this section in the Constitution was deliberately placed there to provide protection against corrupt Federal government officers, such as Family Court judges.
For 15 years the legal and judicial fraternity has covered up injustices and corruption in the secretive Family Court. Only the High Court has power to review the Family Court. Judges can only be sacked by Parliament.
Legally trained whistleblower Bruce Bell is on the run because of his information about corrupt officials in the Family Court who benefit from drug dealing and paedophilia.
Mr Bell said thousands of families were being affected by corrupt decisions in the Family Court, which had resulted in children being knowingly placed in the ‘care’ of abusers.
“Filing against corrupt Federal public officials under s 75 (v) is a crucial Constitutional right of all Australians,” he said.
1
“The High Court is refusing to take action where the Constitution says it must. “The unrelated co-applicants in this case have both had the problem of the other parent sexually abusing their sons.
“Yet three years ago when the High Court was first asked to protect these children, the case was refused filing.
“Many other parents have had the same kind of trouble in the Family Courts and been illegally denied the protection of the High Court.”
Mr Bell said suppression of vital evidence and acceptance by judges of biased material from the Bar table was commonplace and unforgivable.
Not only were children being illegally taken from the better parent, but properties also were being stolen through corrupt Court orders and sold to persons unknown.
“The worst aspect of needlessly secret courts like the Family and State Children’s Courts is that they breed corruption very fast,” he said.

For more information: contact Kevin 0437 003353 or Jenny 0402 025157

High Court Truss Ltr 06 02 14.pdf

 

28 thoughts on “HIGH COURT CORRUPTION REVEALED CORRUPTION REVEALED

  1. No matter if you are a parent or grandparent, the choice is supposed to be made on the best interest of the child, It’s rubbish, children are being psychologicaly damaged due to corupt courts and not a thing is being done, if you take a life you get life, they twistand manipulate all that you say, it’s time we all took a stand to protest and make the truth Kirwan, show how many people are fair Dinkim about wanting this coruption put to a stop ,these courts are criminal and are abusing kids, killing kids, they are taking children’s lives away from then, really they should be tried as criminals.

  2. I am a person that is in the second round of family fedral court nearly 5years now. My ex has breached family court orders for three months told my children i wasn’t telling them that i wasnt trying to see them or ring them. I missed christmas wirh them. I called them twice on Christmas Day wich the children wanted i got abused through a text and was told that because I called tqice that he now would not be honoring the supervised access. Since then i have missed easter and mothers day i asked for mothers day from 9am to 5pm he sent back i was allowed to have 15 minuites and one of
    the children.

    His solicitor has lied to the judge the father has lied to the court reporter and because of this my time with the children is fortnightly i am not allowed to call in between the fortnight this is not the courts decision but it does not allow me to have more acess then the weekend my children are suffering phycologically and emotionally he threatens them and me and any person in the legal courts also stopping me getting information fron there schools. I am continually lising more tome with them i was the main caregiver and the father never spent any time with the children untill i left the ten year marriage i got nothing. He is stalking me but i can’t prove it. I worked throufh the marriage he would not let me back into the house andcas it was only in his name.

    They say they wanr to help women with domestic violence but there doing nothing in the court system and this is where they are there best the men suck upvto the court repirter and the icl i believe the court is corrupt and one person cannot change that.

    I want to stay anonymous

    • I will pray for you, we are the same feeling. I cried so many days and nights. I know we do not need to do the right things ( i guess ) only pretend mental illness and get to top lawyer to get the favor and allow to breach the regulations. I am very sad and shock

      I want to stay anonymous with painful

    • I can feel how you feel, as I am a non-English speaking background and how the judge and other side powerful lawyer are so friendly in the trail and do not care about my presentation. The other party do not obey the law and no need to present the disclosure lists is setting to be won. I can see their face and actions are set to destroy so many ordinary families in WA. Very sad! I learn something is you can pretend mental illness and get a powerful lawyer to get away the legal system, that is happening here. I wish someone can stop the tears for unjustice of the” justice system.”

  3. The Australian Legal Profession is corrupt from North South East and West. It began with Terra Nullius and continues its abuse of families right into the present day and beyond. The highly paid regulators who are supposed to ensure the public are not plundered by this gang of rouges do not do their jobs. Go to http://www.lawyersorgraverobbers and see how useless they are. Until lawyers are bound by Australian Consumer law and the regulators make sure they comply which will mean getting rid of the corrupt lawyers who run these departments, our families along with the destiny of this nation will suffer.

    We as a nation must acknowledge that our current laws do not acknowledge family as the mainstay of our society. Our laws are not run for the benefit of families they are run by lawyers for the benefit of their own power base and how much money they can stuff into their greedy little, big, pockets. .

  4. Can any find me some legislation regarding , do the child protection workers owe duty of care to parents ? Any advice would be appreciated

  5. judge Moncrieff, judge Thackray are editing transcripts every day, to conceal child abuse and lawyer fraud. Amongst other things. Western Australia is massively corrupt. This is also happening in Supreme Court WA.

  6. It is now May 2015, a bit late but I will still leave a comment. I have been fighting to stop the doctoring of court recordings for a number of years. If you have received a doctored copy of a court recording from a court, you are not alone. You may be interested in sharing your story on the Facebook page ‘Australians against Courts Doctoring Court Recordings’.

  7. I have also filed Human Rights complaint against Australia, against Full Court’s decision to overturn WAFC order for my abducted son to be returned to me in Poland, against the FC way of conducting the Hague proceedings.Judge Thuckray and Moncrief were on the panel of 3 judges sitting in Full Court. I was denied to be cross-examined in WAFC and in FC. My appeal to High Court was denied because as I was explained , that I was not a party to the proceedings,but the Commissioner of Police was the only party to the proceedings. I was given ( I paid over $500 for it) “doctored” transcript from FC hearing with facts ommited, which were unpleasant to the judges, where it would have been documented of them to be ostensibly bias. Then the judges lied to the Senate enquiry commitee about the facts in the FC proceedings. Senate had published those lies, which is again a proof of the cover up. My 10 year old now son , four years later is still allienated and with his abusive mother in Australia. I wish I could say aloud about it to the TV in Australia and give the substantiative evidence with it. Arek Zoltowski : art_plus@plo.pl

    • Hi Arek,

      I’m now going through the same, doing a high court application now, 4 years of corruption in Brisbane FC, 3 FC judges Howard, Bell, Forest.

      No DV no fault.

      Of cause the ex gets free legal aid.

      So many lies from the (under) the bench it’s insane really, why do the bother lying and not just tell the truth and do the job there paid for.

      ICL and 3 consultants have claimed the ex is the “primary attachment”, problem is even as a baby he won’t go to her, I say because ex is abusive.

      I got accused of PAS from the bench not the ICL or consultants, because my young son likes me, and has a secure attachment with me, but not the ex,

      I got ordered 1 hour per week supervised contact with my 4yo son, but just got 1 hour in the past 18 months, application rejected by the 4th contact centre in 18 months, based on more lies.

      They have no ethics or morals, let alone honour, so much evidence against them, and they are this massive pact, all tight in with each other.

      So bazaar to be in court watching a judge sitting at the bench lying.

      There not human APD? NPD?

      We need to do something but what?

      Have a look especially at Article 9.

      http://fathersunionaustralia.com/wp/convention-on-the-rights-of-the-child/

      • HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

        Information which may be of assistance if you are applying for special leave to appeal in a civil matter without legal representation

        Appealing to the High Court of Australia (“the High Court”) is a two-step process. You first need to apply for, and be granted, special leave to appeal (“special leave”). These are the main things that you need to know about when applying for special leave.

        1) With very few exceptions, you may only seek special leave from the judgments of:
        a) the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia;
        b) the Full Court or the Court of Appeal of a State or Territory Supreme Court;
        c) the Full Court of the Family Court of Australia; and
        d) a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia (in limited circumstances).

        2) The High Court is not an appellate court in the ordinary sense and special leave is generally only granted in the following limited circumstances:
        a) where a genuine question of public importance arises;
        b) where there is a difference of opinion between, or within, the courts; or
        c) where the interests of justice require it.

        Please see Section 35A of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) for more information.

        3) Understanding Part 41 of the High Court Rules 2004 (“the Rules”) will assist you greatly in making your application for special leave. You can access the Rules, including Part 41, from the High Court’s website on http://www.hcourt.gov.au.

        4) Please note the following:
        a) your application for special leave must comply with Form 23;
        b) it should be filed within 28 days of the judgment below;
        c) if you are out of time in filing your application for special leave, you must seek an order that compliance with the 28 day time limit be dispensed with. This must also be supported by an affidavit explaining the reasons for your delay. (See Rule 41.02.2);
        d) pursuant to Rule 41.01.2, one copy of the following documents (“the accompanying documents”) must also accompany your application for special leave:
        i) a copy of the sealed order or judgment of the court below;
        ii) a copy of the reasons for the judgment below;
        iii) if the judgment below determines an appeal or reviews a decision, a copy of the primary sealed order or judgment or decision;
        iv) the reasons (if any) of the primary court or decision maker that were before the court below; and
        v) the notice of appeal or application for leave to appeal to the court below.
        e) your application for special leave must be typed, it must be single sided and be in a minimum of 12 font. It must also comply with the general formatting requirements which include, but are not limited to, things like margins, line numbering and footers. Please see Rule 1.08 which deals with the preparation of documents generally;
        f) your application for special leave must be accompanied by the relevant fee or fee exemption/waiver application. A fee of $2,177.00 is currently payable, but this can be partially waived if you are suffering from financial hardship. If you hold a current health care card or are in custody however, you are eligible for a reduced filing fee of $100; and
        g) your application for special leave must be filed in the same State or Territory in which the proceedings below were commenced.

        5) Once your application for special leave has been accepted for filing, you must:
        a) serve your application for special leave (along with a copy of the accompanying documents) on each Respondent within 7 days of it being filed;
        b) lodge a copy of your application for special leave with the court below within 7 days of it being filed;
        c) file an affidavit of service within 7 days of your application for special leave being served or lodged;
        d) file three copies of both a written case (Form 18) and a draft notice of appeal (Form 24) within 28 days of filing your application for special leave. Please note that the time limit for filing these documents cannot be extended by a Registrar. If you are late in filing these documents, your matter will be automatically abandoned; and
        e) file two additional copies of the accompanying documents when you file your written case and draft notice of appeal.

        6) Please do not serve your written case and draft notice of appeal until you are told to do so. Someone from the Registry will contact you if/when this becomes necessary.

        7) The Rules allow the Court to determine your application “on the papers” if it considers it appropriate. This means that at least two judges will consider your matter without an oral hearing. If this happens, you will be told when and where the decision in your case is being delivered.

        8) The High Court does not accept documents for filing by post, e-mail or fax. Either you (or someone on your behalf) must file the documents in person.

        9) You may find the following documents available from the High Court website useful:
        a) Form 23 an application for special leave to appeal;
        b) Form 18 a written case;
        c) Form 24 a draft notice of appeal;
        d) Part 41 of the Rules;
        e) Rule 1.08 of the Rules; and
        f) an application for a reduced fee or partial waiver of fees.

        IMPORTANT
        The above information is intended only as a procedural guide to applicants without legal representation. It is recommended that intending applicants seek legal advice before commencing proceedings and, in any event, intending applicants should familiarise themselves with the requirements of the High Court Rules (in particular Part 41, which deals with applications for special leave) and the relevant legislation relating to their application.

        • This information is correct. Plus Self Represented Litigants are invariably dismissed and have been since 1992 – according to High Court Statistics. (High Court Australia should not give out Self Represented Litigants Information Packs) and Tools for Self Represented Litigants on their Website should be taken down.

      • 2.UN Convention on the Rights of a Child of 20.11.1989
        art.9 (1,2,3), art.10(2)

        9(1). States Parties shall ensure that a child shall not be separated from his or her parents against their will, except when competent authorities subject to judicial review determine, in accordance with applicable law and procedures, that such separation is necessary for the best interests of the child. Such determination may be necessary in a particular case such as one involving abuse or neglect of the child by the parents, or one where the parents are living separately and a decision must be made as to the child’s place of residence.
        2. In any proceedings pursuant to paragraph 1 of the present article, all interested parties shall be given an opportunity to participate in the proceedings and make their views known.
        3. States Parties shall respect the right of the child who is separated from one or both parents to maintain personal relations and direct contact with both parents on a regular basis, except if it is contrary to the child’s best interests.
        10(2). A child whose parents reside in different States shall have the right to maintain on a regular basis, save in exceptional circumstances personal relations and direct contacts with both parents. Towards that end and in accordance with the obligation of States Parties under article 9, paragraph 1, States Parties shall respect the right of the child and his or her parents to leave any country, including their own, and to enter their own country. The right to leave any country shall be subject only to such restrictions as are prescribed by law and which are necessary to protect the national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Convention.
        Article 12: States Parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express those views freely in all matters affecting the child, the views of the child being given due weight in accordance with the age and maturity of the child.
        Article 19 :take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social and educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation, including sexual abuse, while in the care of parent(s), legal guardian(s) or any other person who has the care of the child.

        • You forgot one important thing Self Represented Litigants will Invariably be dismissed 41.10. You never get into the High Court. Self Represented Litigants are discriminated against and the Australian Constitution is Convoluted.

      • Australian Criminal Code Act – Par134. Conspiracy to bring false accusation
        Any person who conspires with another to charge any person or cause any person to be charged with any offence, whether alleged to have been committed in Western Australia, or elsewhere, knowing that such person is innocent of the alleged offence, or not believing him to be guilty of the alleged offence, is guilty of a crime.
        If the offence is such that a person convicted of it is liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for life, the offender is liable to imprisonment for 20 years.
        If the offence is such that a person convicted of it is liable to be sentenced to imprisonment, but for a term less than life, the offender is liable to imprisonment for 14 years.
        In any other case the offender is liable to imprisonment for 7 years.
        [Section 134 amended by No. 118 of 1981 s. 5; No. 52 of 1984 s. 15; No. 119 of 1985 s. 30; No. 51 of 1992 s. 16(2); No. 29 of 2008 s. 16(4).]
        Accordingly, in addition the below paragraphs would also apply to mother Olga Zoltowski and her friend Tania Wheeler :
        Par.129. Fabricating evidence, Par.131. Deceiving witnesses, par.135. Conspiring to defeat justice,
        par.143. Attempting to pervert course of justice, par.169. False statements on oath,
        par.170. False information to officials etc.,
        The Criminal Code
        Part III Offences against the administration of law and justice and against public authority
        Chapter XX Miscellaneous offences against public authority
        s. 171page 108 Version 16-d0-00 As at 30 Nov 2011
        par.171(2) Creating false belief, [Section 171 inserted by No. 70 of 2004 s. 15.

      • Steve Biddulph, the Australia’s best known family therapist and parenting author of his books, including “The secret of Happy Children” (published in ten languages), the acclaimed book “Manhood” and as I quote in this Application a few verses of the book titled : “ Raising boys ”( “why boys are different-and how to help them become happy and well-balanced men”) , show how important in the life of a boy is a role of his biological father :

        a) page 12 of a book : “At around six years of age, little boys seem to lock on to their dad, and want to be with him, learn from him and copy him. Boys may steal, wet the bed, act aggressively at school and develop any number of problem behaviors just to get Dad to take interest” .

        b) page 30: ”at about six, the boys show a strong interest in maleness, and the father becomes the primary parent. His interest and time become critical “.

        c) page 81: “Many people ask: Do dads matter – can’t mothers do it all? The research supporting the importance of dads is overwhelming. Boys with absent fathers are statistically more likely to be violent, get hurt, get into trouble, do poorly in schools and be members of teenage gangs in adolescence”

        Further explanation to the above is on the page 179 : “ Blankenhorn.D in “Fatherless America”,Basic Books New York,1995. Blankernhorn’s book is statistically well researched, and makes a powerful case. Especially for the US where 40 percent of children do not have their father in the home. Low attainment at school, teen pregnancy, juvenile crime convictions, learning difficulties and early school leaving, as well as domestic violence and sexual abuse of children, are all higher in families, where the birth father is no longer present.
        Having a real father, live father on the spot is clearly the best arrangement if he is a half-reasonable, safe, and caring man“.

    • Hi Arek, STOP THE PRESS, Ray Thompson in Western Australia has a writ filed successfully against Chief Judge Thackray for allowing child abuse and failing in his duty of care to protect children, the writ is accepted to ‘commence proceedings’ (not a direction hearing) 3rd December 2014 in the WA Supreme Court. ALL WELCOME.

      Just having the writ accepted for proceedings is a VICTORY for all of us.

      I am watching closely, I expect to view paper work next week and start preparing a writ against Judge Moncrieff who is involved in child abuse, forms of child abuse and property fraud and deliberately fabricating evidence to do it.

      Also I am in Supreme Court WA this week for recent appeal, and will commence a writ against any Judge who covers up Judge Moncrieffs fraud for the second time.
      John Donaldson 0414 454 981.
      Family Court Injustice Group WA,

  8. hi I just spoke to Jenny, I am John Donaldson with Family Court Injustice Group WA. I have made public serious criminal allegations against Judge Thackray and Judge Moncrieff on internet, public speaking University etc etc. My number is 0414454981.

    • In law, treason is the crime that covers some of the more extreme acts against one’s sovereign or nation 80.1AA Treason–materially assisting enemies etc.

      Assisting enemies at war with the Commonwealth

      (1) A person commits an offence if:

      (a) the Commonwealth is at war with an enemy (whether or not the existence of a state of war has been declared); and

      (b) the enemy is specified, by Proclamation made for the purpose of this paragraph, to be an enemy at war with the Commonwealth; and

      (c) the person engages in conduct; and

      (d) the person intends that the conduct will materially assist the enemy to engage in war with the Commonwealth; and

      (e) the conduct assists the enemy to engage in war with the Commonwealth; and

      (f) when the person engages in the conduct, the person:

      (i) is an Australian citizen; or

      (ii) is a resident of Australia; or

      (iii) has voluntarily put himself or herself under the protection of the Commonwealth; or

      (iv) is a body corporate incorporated by or under a law of the Commonwealth or of a State or Territory.

      Penalty: Imprisonment for life.

      Note: If a body corporate is convicted of an offence against subsection (1), subsection 4B(3) of the Crimes Act 1914 allows a court to impose a fine of up to 10,000 penalty units.

      (2) Despite subsection 12(2) of the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 , a Proclamation made for the purpose of paragraph (1)(b) of this section may be expressed to take effect from a day:

      (a) before the day on which the Proclamation is registered under the Legislative Instruments Act 2003 ; but

      (b) not before the day on which the Proclamation is made.

      (3) The fault element for paragraph (1)(f) is intention.

      Note: For intention, see subsection 5.2(2).

Leave a Reply